GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r

## Summary `Repo.init()` forwards `**kwargs` verbatim to `git init` with no unsafe-option guard and no `allow_unsafe_options` parameter. `git init --template=<dir>` copies `<dir>/hooks/*` into the new repo's `.git/hooks`, so an attacker-controlled `template` kwarg plants a hook that executes on the next git operation → arbitrary code execution. `--template` is already recognized as unsafe for clone (it is on `unsafe_git_clone_options`, and GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf covers the clone path), but `Repo.init` is a distinct method that never received a guard and needs an independent fix. ## Root Cause `Repo.init(path, mkdir, odbt, expand_vars, **kwargs)` is a bare `git.init(**kwargs)` (git/repo/base.py:1435) with no `check_unsafe_options` and no `allow_unsafe_options`. ## Impact Arbitrary code execution (hook fires on next git op) at the privileges of the host process. Two preconditions raise attack complexity (AC:H): the app must forward a `template=` kwarg (KEY control) AND the attacker must stage an executable hook directory at a known path — the same profile GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf accepted as HIGH for the clone path. Default `allow_unsafe_options` is irrelevant here because `Repo.init` has no guard at all. ## Proof of Concept ```python # attacker stages /evil/hooks/post-commit (executable) from git import Repo Repo.init(path, template="/evil") # next commit runs /evil/hooks/post-commit -> ACE ``` ## Attack Chain 1. Entry: attacker stages `/evil/hooks/post-commit` (executable) and gets the app to call `Repo.init(path, template='/evil')`. 2. Check: NONE on `Repo.init`. Bypass proof: base.py:1435 is a bare `git.init(**kwargs)`. argv (observed): `['git','init','--template=/evil']`. 3. Sink: git copies `/evil/hooks/post-commit` → `<repo>/.git/hooks/post-commit`. 4. Impact: next commit runs the hook → arbitrary code execution. ## Bypass Evidence Independently reproduced (gate harness): `Repo.init(dst, template='<evil>')` → argv `['git','init','--template=<evil>']` unguarded; ho