UNKNOWNCVSS not yet scoredVulnerability

CVE-2026-98995

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: reset the old parent's ->overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint() __umount_mnt() resets ->overmount of the parent when it unmounts the mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn't. It moves the mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it. For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn't matter. The new mount has already reset ->overmount of the old parent by the time the old top mount is moved onto it. It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving overmount onto the first ancestor that isn't going to be unmounted. The mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive ->overmount points at the moved mount. That's a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is unmounted and freed. do_lock_mount() follows ->overmount from the target path under mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there. So reset ->overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount's ->overmount is then always a mount that is attached to it.

Properties

Last source
NVD
Nvd fetched at
2026-10-23T14:24:59.572098+00:00
Cve id
CVE-2026-98995
First seen by Signal
2026-10-23T14:28:01+00:00
Name
CVE-2026-98995
Retrieved at
2026-10-23T14:28:01+00:00
Published at
2026-10-23T13:17:21.660
Last modified
2026-10-23T13:17:21.660

Explore deeper with Ninja Signal's threat intelligence graph

CVE-2026-98995 — Ninja Signal Threat Intelligence | Ninja Signal