CVE-2026-85999

## Summary Before tokenizing, `selector_iter` trims leading/trailing whitespace and comments by running two regexes over the whole raw selector with `.search()`. The trailing one, `RE_WS_END = re.compile(r'{WSC}*$')`, is anchored only at the end (`$`), not the start. Because `.search()` retries the pattern at every offset, a long run of whitespace or CSS comments that is not sitting exactly at the end of the string makes each retry greedily consume the run and then fail `$`, producing O(n²) time. This triggers on perfectly valid selectors — e.g. a descendant combinator with a long whitespace gap, `a` + `" "*n` + `b` — so no malformed input is required. A single valid ~20 KB selector stalls the interpreter for ~10 s of CPU. ## Trust model (Q0) The selector string is the input, reaching this code via `soupsieve.compile()`, the `soupsieve.select/iselect/match/filter` helpers, and BeautifulSoup's `soup.select(selector)` / `soup.select_one(selector)`. Exploitable wherever an application passes a user-controlled CSS selector to BeautifulSoup/soupsieve. Applications using only hard-coded selectors are unaffected. ## Root cause (exact anchors) — `src/soupsieve/css_parser.py` ```python # line 185-186 RE_WS_BEGIN = re.compile(fr'^{WSC}*') # anchored at start -> .search() only tries pos 0 -> linear (safe) RE_WS_END = re.compile(fr'{WSC}*$') # NOT anchored at start -> .search() tries every offset # selector_iter, lines ~1322-1326 m = RE_WS_BEGIN.search(pattern) index = m.end(0) if m else 0 m = RE_WS_END.search(pattern) # <-- O(n^2) here end = (m.start(0) - 1) if m else (len(pattern) - 1) ``` `WSC = (?:{WS}|{COMMENTS})`. For `RE_WS_END = (?:WS|COMMENTS)*$`, `.search()` walks start offsets 0..n. Whenever the offset lands inside a long whitespace/comment run, `(?:WS|COMMENTS)*` greedily consumes to the run's end, then `$` fails (a non-whitespace char follows), the engine backtracks the whole run, the offset advances by one, and the work repeats — O